Gaming the (Twitter) election

Last night, we did a hyper-short meeting of my large Intro Interactive grad seminar, so that we were able to go to a panel discussion on race, gender, and age in the coverage of the election. One of the objectives of the day was to get folks Twittering, and so, in about 4 minutes, I showed them Twitter and got them to sign up. As we were headed out the door to parade across campus for the panel, I encouraged them to Twitter in the panel, using the hashtag “#501”.

OK, a quick aside. Many find live-twittering events annoying, since it results in a flood of posts. Had I the time, I would have set up an alt account to twitter the event. Someone complained (protected tweet, so I will not quote) about my own flood. As an aside, this poster noted that IRC was a more appropriate way to do this. In fact, students in this course regularly use IRC (via mibbit since our campus is port-unfriendly to IRC), but I wanted to expose them to Twitter and get them using it, and so this was an experiment in that direction.

With about a dozen people tweeting, the #501 hashtag quickly popped up on a number of trend analyzers on Twitter, eventually becoming the number one keyword on the Elections page. I was pretty surprised by this, to be honest. I don’t know how many people watch that page, but I suspect it’s a fairly large number of people who are heavily involved in tracking the elections. Having “#501” pop up was confusing to a lot of folks. Many seemed to think we were intentionally gaming the system. In fact, it was just a dozen people, many of them new accounts, twittering up a storm. If someone wanted so flood that system, it looks like it wouldn’t be that difficult.

Posted in General | Tagged | 4 Comments

[ir9] First session (and my paper)

Yesterday, the Internet Research 9.0 conference got going at IT University in Copenhagen with a set of workshops. I participated as a mentat mentor, and I’m not sure how much the doctoral students got out of it, but I learned a great deal. It’s an interesting way of meeting academically, since we tend to deliver “finished product” at conferences, rather than ideas and works in progress–even in sessions labeled explicitly as meant for work in progress.

This morning I presented in the first slot on the first day of the program. Being the first presentation of the day is never a good thing–folks aren’t there and when they are they are not awake–but better the first day than the last! I’ve already posted my own presentation, as well as the beginning of a series describing how I did the research. The presentation went, OK, I guess, but there were not many questions–in fact, I was worried that there would be none–so either the presentation sucked a bit, or they were just stunned by it. I fear, through my read of the audience that it fell a bit flat.

The advantage to going first is now it is done, and it leaves me to be able to be an observer to a greater degree and enjoy others’ presentation. The first of the remaining papers in my session, by Marianne van den Boomen, talks about communities and networks as metaphors for online discussion. Her argument is that such metaphors (and particularly the community metaphor) has a long history, and one that brings with it notions that are not at all reflective of the divided attention on the web. (As an aside, she mentioned a book I want to look up for possible use in my undergrad class: Networking with Bodies and Machines). This was a very nice overview of the problem of metaphors, and given some of my interest in metaphorical thinking and the internet, it was great to see it well handled. I recommended yesterday that students should avoid the entire concept of community, since it was so tied up in such debates. Nonetheless, as a thinking tool, the “network” and the “community” is an interesting approach.

Andrew Cox presented a paper on the nature of Flickr groups: how do people use this. Previous work shows little use of groups, little group loyalty, and little cross-posting of photos. This was largely an exploratory paper, establishing some metrics, and being able to provide a classification of group types, and the various participation in the groups. It’s a useful collection, but isn’t entirely clear what it shows, or how it generalizes beyond Flickr. I may have missed this, however.

Andra Siibak presented an analysis of self-presentation on rate.ee a site used by Estonian youth for social networking and dating. She analyzed the photos on the site, as well as surveying users. She showed an interesting break between what people say are important and how they depict themselves in their images.

Posted in General | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Copenhagen presentation

Off for Denmark in a few hours. Here are my slides for my Tuesday morning presentation. I didn’t have time to do my now standard video-based presentation style. Much more basic this time around…

Trying Google Presenter, too.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Christopher Buckley comes out for Obama

I always had a soft spot for William F. Buckley, as I suspect many in academia did–even those who found him infuriating. Perhaps its just the shift of the right in the US that made him look good in comparison, a shift that it seemed, toward the end of his life, that he too was exasperated with.

I’ll admit to also having had a soft spot for McCain in the past, but I am quite over that. I liked that he was honest to a fault, or at least I assumed him to be. The idea of a straight-talking politician was refreshing, although it seems clear now (I do not believe that personalities can change so rapidly) that this was a craven branding attempt more than anything else.

I was pleased to see a column penned by Buckley’s son entitled Sorry, Dad, I’m voting for Obama. I somehow doubt WFB would have gone so far, but I strongly suspect that he would have found the current state of the campaign beyond distasteful. Christopher Buckley suggests that he didn’t publish the piece in the NRO, because he feared the reaction it would have from the conservative readers. In this, I think he has made a mistake.

He has a clear set of reasons for his position, and I think they are valid reasons. As David Brooks argues, the anti-intellectualism of this race has reached its apotheosis in Palin. She may not be stupid–maybe she reflects the average American’s understanding of the world. While we celebrate the idea that anyone in America could become the president of the United States, implicit in that promise is the idea that anyone could learn enough that he or she could do the job well. It’s not (although I kind of like the idea) meant to be something awarded by lottery.

I understand conservative reactions toward what is seen as liberal attitudes among much of the professoriate. I don’t agree with them, but I understand them. But I think the Republican leadership, in an effort to gain the support of the least educated, and ultra-conservative reactionaries in the country, have begun to believe that merit is a bad thing. As Jon Stewart says, we want Navy SEALS to be our most elite troops, wouldn’t we want our president and vice president to be elite politicians?

So, although I welcome Mr. Buckley’s vote for Obama, and his tenuous endorsement, I only wish more NRO readers would be exposed to it. I am concerned that the negativity of the campaigns will make for a toxic post-election environment in Washington. I think McCain is pretty set in his ways, and I think he has little respect for Obama, but I saw his face when someone in the crowd yelled “Kill him!” referring to Obama. He look flustered, confused, literally taken aback. Others in the audience laughed nervously or openly. In some ways I think McCain is playing with fire that he really doesn’t understand. I am not willing to excuse him and suggest that his campaign leadership is pushing him toward things he wouldn’t otherwise say. Leadership means taking responsibility for your staff and your words. But I hope McCain will understand that when he walks the fence with racist rhetoric, when he suggests that his opponent is disloyal or an enemy of America, he sullies not just the democratic process, but the chance to make America a better place. He has expressed a desire to protect the honor of his family’s name; this campaign is not doing that.

Posted in General | Tagged | 1 Comment