Snow on Broadway

Snowing on the Broadway Mall

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

When weird is normal

It is, I think, a reasonable corollary of symbolic interactionism, that you are only as smart as the people around you. Some of that smart rubs off, and even if it doesn’t you see yourself, and become yourself, through their eyes. As a strategy, therefore, it’s a good idea to surround yourself with smart people.

The same goes, I think, for character, beauty, and many other attributes. It’s not just a matter of homophily, the idea that we seek out the familiar. No, we become like those around us, to some extent, so like smiling when you are not really happy, it makes sense to socialize with with your role models, whenever possible.

But I had the opportunity to have a conversation with someone this week that brought me to a realization of something that should be sensible to anyone really: people will think you are strange if they are not significantly outside of the norm themselves. There are some real advantages to being a radical among conservatives, being an agent of change, even in a small way. Some people make a living out of being the strangest person in the room–it is built into their identity that they are “different,” and so they do the unexpected even when it is not the best course of action. It’s difficult, sometimes, to tell the difference between those who are different just to get people’s attention, and those who want to get people’s attention to make them different.

And so, it’s nice to surround yourself with people who are strange, but probably not people who are strange like you. The latter is called a cult. The former celebrates the idea that normal is boring, and that strangeness comes in a lot of different flavors. Am I excited to talk to someone who is very different from me in background and culture? I won’t lie: I’m not particularly adept at talking to people no matter how similar they are to me. But I embrace the margins, because when you hang out with the strange, they are likely to see you as pretty normal.

Posted in General | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

A Panglossian View of the Depression

We have, in our minds, a view of the last Depression, and an assumption that this one has to look the same. But it doesn’t. So, without negating the negative impact on our economy, let’s talk about making lemonade from lemons.

Box Playgrounds

Big box stores are dropping left and right; Linens-and-Things and Circuit City may be just the beginning. Yet we have these strip malls on steroids dotting our entire country. Let’s use some Federal money to make sure that these don’t just become any more of a rotting blight than they already are. In colder and wetter climes, put people to work turning these into playgrounds. Send a bus around the local area to pick up and drop off kids and parents who have had to ditch their second (or fourth) car. These wouldn’t have to be playgrounds only for little kids. Some of these are big enough for small playing fields, rock walls, or–sweet irony–Obama bowling alleys.

Victory Mall

They wisely shot down a big budget item for re-seeding the Mall. I like the grandeur of DC as much as anyone, but perhaps it’s good for lawmakers to look out on a strip of dirt in the heart of the nation’s capitol, as a daily reminder of what we are facing. But better yet, as my mom suggests, isn’t it time for Victory Gardens on the Mall? Allowing US citizens to grow wholesome vegetables on public land would represent at the very least a symbolic gesture toward accepting a new form of thrift. More veggies will be good for the national waistline, and as Ben Franklin suggests, good for our economic well-being.

30 Hour Work Week

The idea of forced, unpaid furloughs, as in the case of the unpaid 12-day “holiday” required of ASU faculty make sense as an extreme way of making sure you don’t put people out of work. Of course, in some cases, the economic downturn represents a ready-made excuse for shedding ineffective staff, but generally speaking, the disruption seems to be minimized when you ask everyone to take a pay cut (and work cut) instead of sending individuals out the door. It seems like–relatively speaking–a much more humane approach, particularly in the rare cases where workers can make that decision collectively, rather than having it forced on them.

After economic downturns, we often see new efficiencies, as organizations find they are able to do the same work with less people. Imagine how good it would be for the country if organizations recognized a 30-hour work week was a good idea. Now, of course, for some people (faculty fit into this group, as do professionals who bill by the hour), there will not really be a 30-hour work week, but if that becomes the standard, we can work more efficiently during that time, and give ourselves all a 20% time: for volunteering, entrepreneurial activities, arts, crafts, sports, and leisure. Heck, maybe we can spend some of that time tending to our Victory Gardens.

We are all freegans now

I was waiting outside of Gristedes a couple of weeks ago when they brought the trash to the curb. Within minutes, people descended on the trash pile. I’d make the “like flies” metaphor that seems so apt, but the truth is the sorting was more contemplative and polite. This was not an organized group–they all came singly. Some looked down on their luck, others looked like this was just a sensible way of getting food. I’m not as repulsed as some about the freegan movement–I’ve done a bit of dumpster-diving for non-food items–but it’s outside of my comfort level, to be sure. Nonetheless, I find those who do it to be admirable in some sense, extracting utility at the margins of a consumerist food culture.

Is excess “out”?

This may be a classist argument, but it seems we abandoned any sense of refinement in the widespread hyperconsumerism of the last decade. Everything had to be big, for no good reason. McMansions required people to work so hard they never saw some of the rooms they were struggling to pay the mortgage on. Hummers and other giant SUVs guzzled gas like it was subsidized or something–which it was, in some cases traded for the blood of American soldiers and civilians in many parts of the world. In my ideal world, we have at least a bit of a taste realignment, with conspicuous consumption again becoming gauche among the middle class.

And my fervent desire is that a recovery hits the middle class rather than growing the disparity of wealth even more in the US. It’s not too much to hope for–grown in much of the world has led to a thriving middle class. It’s mainly places like the US, China, and Russia that have seen an extreme income gap.

Creative Society

I’ve heard a lot of talk about how the economic downturn can be traced to the fact that our brightest minds were “trading in wind” rather than actually making stuff. There is a danger in that declaration that we will see efforts to increase our industrial sector, making steel and automobiles. There is nothing wrong with that, but if we do not build our innovation infrastructure we will never see anything approaching a recovery. Physical widgets are not the only measure of “real” productivity. Scientific and technical advancement are more important, to my mind, and I’m happy to see indications that the current administration seems to agree.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 3 Comments

Perfect Search?

Posted in Technology | Tagged | 3 Comments