Glorious Five Year Plan

I started to write a whiny post about a season that feels overly filled with angst. Rather than bother you with my continuing mid-life crisis, which began when I was about fifteen and has yet to abate, I figured I would instead bore you, Dear Reader, with some goals that would help me to see the possibility of getting my glass to the half-filled mark.

First, I should say that the angst comes along with–in fact, is probably spurred by–a lot of good stuff that’s happened over the last year.

I live vicariously through my one-year-old son’s daily discoveries. We spent a while this weekend at the new Tarr Playground in Central Park, and seeing Jasper tool around the park and playing with him has to be one of the best things I’ve ever been able to do in my whole life. It makes me indescribably happy.

Over the last year, I’ve been working with the DML Hub, and as a result have had the chance to learn from, without any exaggeration, some of the brightest and most interesting people I’ve ever run across. Many of these folks are people I have read or met before, but I am thankful for the opportunity to get to know their work even a little better, and it gives me the opportunity to think about things in new ways. I am deeply appreciative of that opportunity, and so I am–in a way–thankful for its ability to shake my complacency. As someone who buys the symbolic interactionist position, perhaps the best way to grow as a person is to surround yourself with people you admire.

And these are just some of the things that have just gone right. My partner has made a new career for herself, and although we don’t spend as much time together as I would like as a family, what time we do spend is wonderful. And I’ve managed to build and write some things I’m happy with and proud of. But even with all of this, my attention feels as if it is torn in too many directions, and I feel like too much of my time is wasted on things that are not important. And I feel like I am not able to do my best on either the stuff I’m most excited about or the things I am expected to do regardless of how excited I am about them.

Given this, I need to make changes to make sure I know what my goals are and can effectively meet them. A lot of that comes under the label of “time management,” though that is a deceptive label. Really, it is paying more attention to what I am paying attention to, and prioritizing that effort toward things I want to make real progress on. I used to do 5 hour, 5 day, 5 month, 5 year goals. And I’ll continue to think about general direction, though my problem isn’t too few goals, but too many.

The major goal, though, is to increase my discipline with regard to selecting and accomplishing goals. That is, I have a major meta-goal. To that end, I plan on setting up new habits one-by-one. Here are my first few:

1. Prioritize Quadrant Two activities.

In particular, I’m going to go ahead and organize my To Do list (and keep it up to date) within these quadrants. How do I decide what is important? I choose those items that I believe will result in the largest and most significant outcome.

2. Peas first.

At the end of the day assign myself my most avoided task for the beginning of the next day.

3. Batch email.

Since I won’t be checking email first thing in the morning, that means batching email. Empty it out once a day.

4. Resign.

I need to quit (or push off my agenda for the time being) projects that are not personally rewarding. This means turning down exciting offers, and it means recognizing battles better left unfought.

Posted in General | 1 Comment

Zipcar Fail

Let me start out by saying I have been a big fan of Zipcar for many years. For those not in the know, the company provides cars parked in local lots that you can unlock with an RFID enabled card and take out in half-hour increments to accomplish quick chores. They also have a nice complement of cars, including Minis, VWs, Tahomas, Scions, and BMWs. For a while, one of my most visited pages on this blog was one with a coupon for the service and I would guess hundreds of people have signed up on my recommendation. It’s only because I love Zipcar that I am posting now about my disappointment.

My commute necessitates that I keep my own car, but I started using Zipcar when I moved to Manhattan, and I’ve kept my account as a convenience. At first, it felt almost too good to be true. Almost any time I wanted, I could go across the street and rent a car by the hour. The prices, while not cheap, were fair, particularly with gas and insurance covered. As Zipcar has grown, I can now grab a car in many of the cities I visit as well, and since I tend to stay near universities, the cars are often nearby. Unfortunately, I was disappointed by my experience renting last night, and it is frustrating because it is an entirely fixable flaw.

Last night, I needed a car to go and pick up my own car, which had blown out a couple of tires on a giant NYC pothole and was getting re-shod over in Jersey. I reserved the car from 6pm, and trundled down to the garage: me, my partner, the baby, and a heavy and awkward car seat in the rain. When we got there, the car we had reserved was not there. It had not been returned on time. This is almost inevitable–sometimes people will blow out their appointment. This is actually the second time this has happened for me in NYC.

We waited for about 10 minutes–no luck. There were two other Zipcars on the lot, ready to go out. So, the obvious thing would be to swap our reservation for one of those that was available. I called the 800 number and spent 10 minutes waiting on hold. In the rain and cold, with a grumpy one year old. After 15 minutes, I handed my phone over to my partner, used her phone to go to Zipcar’s website, and cancelled my reservation. There was a $22 fee, but we figured at this point they wouldn’t charge us for a car they couldn’t provide, and I couldn’t rent another while I had an existing reservation. The car was cancelled instantly, and the new reservation made. 25 minutes after we had reserved, we were into a different car, and I was going through the always fun task of installing the baby’s car seat. My partner, meanwhile was still sitting on hold–now approaching 20 minutes.

My partner tried to politely explain the situation, but they said they couldn’t talk to her. (This always seems dumb to me. All she would have to do is lie and say she was me–we both have unisex names–but she isn’t the sort to do that. And anyone committing a fraud isn’t going to say “I’m not the person listed on the card.”) So, she hands me the phone and I say I’m in the middle of installing a carseat, and I’m fine with my spouse having this conversation. Note that such an authorization is fine for credit card companies, but not good enough for Zipcar.

I once again explained what happened. I was frustrated, both by waiting in the rain for half an hour and by the car seat, but I was polite. She said she would remove the cancellation charge, and then began explaining to me that the appropriate way to handle this was to call, so they didn’t have to reverse the charges.

“You do realize that you had me on hold for 20 minutes, right?”

I suppose she was frustrated by my response. And while not outright rude, she was terse and pointedly unhelpful. Given the tone of the exchange, I am now going to have to check to see whether she actually accomplished the charge reversal, and contest it with Zipcar and my card if not. In the end, I spent the seven dollars for the half-hour I couldn’t use the car, but more importantly, this was a waste of my family’s time that could have easily been avoided. By the end of this experience, I was almost ready to cancel my membership.

Perhaps I am expecting too much, but I think one of the reasons to have a really good automated service is so that when it fails–as in this case it did–you are able to provide the very best customer service person-to-person. Credit cards may be able to get away with keeping you on hold for twenty minutes, because at least you can do things around the house or office, but in this case we had somewhere to be–the shop was closing at seven–and we were stuck out in nasty weather as a family. My expectation is two minutes, not twenty.

Or more to the point: one of the things Zipcar has done really well is automating this process. You can reserve and change reservations via the web, a phone tree, or even SMS for some things. When I remade the reservation, I had access to the car within less than a minute. They should be rightfully proud of this interface. But their system “knew” that the car had not been returned. How hard would it have been for it to let me know that, and to give me options? This would have saved me from ever having to talk to a person (something I would vastly prefer). It would also have saved Zipcar money–less people to pay in a call center.

And when I do have to talk to a person, make sure that person is well trained and has the autonomy to make reasonable decisions and requests. I needed only one thing from this person, to reverse an unreasonable charge. I didn’t need a lecture about how this all could have been avoided if I had just been a little more patient and waited longer on hold. Something was missing there.

This is the second time I’ve had this experience. The first time, several years ago, the person was unhelpful–there wasn’t much they could do. This time, there was a ridiculously easy solution: move me to an unutilized vehicle, but their systems made that unnecessarily difficult. I really like the company, and I really hope they can do better with this. I like being able to recommend them, but right now, such recommendations come with a heavy caveat: don’t rely on a car actually being there, and avoid having to talk to customer service.

Update: The day I posted this I was contacted by a rep from Zipcar who noted that they were aware that there were improvements to be made when Zipcars are not available. I’m glad the company’s aware enough to hear my (very public) gripes, and I’m certainly interested in seeing them succeed in making progress in this area. Look forward to seeing how they move forward.

Posted in General | 1 Comment

Girl With the Dragon Tattoo

With a little person running around, I get to go to the movies far less often, and so can take fewer risks. I still do want to see Burton’s Alice, despite the decidedly mixed reviews, but instead decided to see the well-reviewed Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (Män som hatar kvinnor). A number of people had recommended the book to me, and I’d nearly picked it up a half-dozen times, but never got to it. I’m glad; I don’t usually enjoy film adaptations if I’ve read the book. But having seen it in a theater of people who had almost universally read the novel, and suggested some ways afterward in which the film differed, I’m looking forward to going back and reading the trilogy.

There’s nothing shocking here in terms of the ingredients: a bit of a murder mystery, a cold case, appropriately claustrophobic settings, natural beauty, revenge, a bit of a tech piece that does not clobber you over the head (well, unless you are under the mistaken impression that anything but Macs are used in Sweden), some great acting, a few twists that are not obvious, and a few Nazis for flavor–these are things you expect in a suspense/thriller. But they are mixed together and baked very nearly to perfection in the film. There is very little to find fault with, and each scene is laid out beautifully. If you get the chance, and like the genre, do go and see it.

Of course, most Americans won’t, because it means reading subtitles. As a result, the American version is already in the works. Given the film’s success in Swedish, there is a lot of hype about the US version. One combination sees it with Depp as Blomkvist and Tarantino directing. (What, no Coen Bros?). Of course, this would be a very different film. One can only hope it wouldn’t be different in the same way that, say, Point of No Return was different from Nikita. In any case, see it in this version. It’s a good movie.

And, I’ll go one step farther. I think a large foundation should underwrite getting foreign films out of the art house and into wide distribution. I think film is a great way for people to experience a slice of culture foreign to their own. Yes, I recognize that Sweden is not rife with serial murders and neo-punk hackers (or is it–I’ve never been!), but at least people get a feeling for a different aesthetic, different ways of interacting, and subtly different values.

Posted in General | Tagged , | 1 Comment

MS: For your protection

Vista’s on my main machine. For what it’s worth, it isn’t nearly as buggy as people seem to think. I’ve been reluctant to make the upgrade until 7 has been pushed along farther, and may decide to not make that transition.

And because it is necessary, I run Windows Update. But Update has, for the last few weeks, been pushing me to install “Office Genuine Advantage Notifications” as an “Important” update. While it may be important to Microsoft, it is utterly unimportant to me. I’m supposed to download it because it will tell me if my copy of Office is pirated. I really don’t care too much. It’s the copy the university provided and given our university, I’m pretty sure it is a duly licensed copy.

But, given past experience, I don’t trust Microsoft to adequately judge whether it is or is not properly licensed. And really all of this comes down to trust. Microsoft doesn’t trust me as a user, and frankly, I don’t have a lot of trust in it as a software provider. And not just because of things like the Spy Guide, but because they seem to have a habit of “fixing” their software with things that make it worse.

Moreover, I don’t like the premise. If they think I’m a pirate, then go after me legally. Don’t assume I’m guilty and force me into the “if you aren’t guilty why not just let us look through your computer” trap.

Unfortunately, after scanning the net a bit, I don’t see any way to get update to ignore this bit of crap. My choice then is to be annoyed by it or get rid of Windows Update. In other words, MS has managed to make its software interfere with my productivity, and as a result, I’m forced to make it less secure. Maybe they should spend more time making good software–things I’d actually want to install–rather than bad software to bug me to install more bad software to let them know if I’ve stolen any bad software.

(Oh, and to provide a quick shortcut for expected comments. I have and do use Linux but it has its own problems. And yes, OS X is better, but it only runs–well & legally–on overpriced Mac hardware. But MS is quickly falling from its “best of all evils” position.)

Posted in Technology | Tagged | 1 Comment