Comments on: Googlebombing “for good” http://alex.halavais.net/googlebombing-for-good/ Things that interest me. Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:45:27 +0000 hourly 1 By: lago http://alex.halavais.net/googlebombing-for-good/comment-page-1/#comment-978 Mon, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=653#comment-978 Next, SuperVoteLinks. This is a problem because we can’t seem to figure out that the way machines evaluate links (quantitatively) is not particularly appropriate to the way people rank pages and links (qualitatively). Slapping more metadata just provides a way to game the qualitative as well as the quantitative. How about just showing the context for the highly weighted links so people can figure it out for themselves? It boggles my mind that technologists seem to want to make life easier for the machines rather than the people. I touched on this topic in this entry on generative entrenchment and this entry on VoteLinks).

]]>
By: Alex http://alex.halavais.net/googlebombing-for-good/comment-page-1/#comment-979 Mon, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=653#comment-979 I do like the idea of including the context of the link, and think that would be workable. But it is also too easy to underestimate how effective PageRank really is in *most* cases. That is, it is flawed, but only insofar as every way of ranking such pages are flawed. It can be improved, or superceded, but those solutions aren’t out there right now.

Hillis, I think, is the one who says something along the lines of “the interface becomes the reality.” (Maybe it’s not Hillis, maybe it’s a bunch of people; whatever.) I think in the blogging world, that has definitely become the case. A link isn’t just a link: it’s an indication of friendship and respect. I recently removed my blogroll, figuring people could more effectively draw on my public Bloglines account to see what I’m reading. I actually got complaints about this, because it directly effects people’s Technorati rating.

Can anyone say “second-order system”? The tools meant to measure importance or significance are now gamed as a routine sort of thing. The idea that links implied endoresement has always been flawed, but by making that assumption, I have a feeling many Web authors now include that calculus in the process of deciding to make a link.

]]>
By: scribblingwoman http://alex.halavais.net/googlebombing-for-good/comment-page-1/#comment-980 Mon, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=653#comment-980 Googlebomb update
Alex Halavais points out that the recent googlebombing of the word “jew” was only successful in the short term, questions…

]]>