Archive for the 'Quiz' Category

I am such a girl

Thursday, July 3rd, 2008

So, I was watching a BBC show on the “Secrets of the Sexes” (below), and realized that I hadn’t done a self-indulgent online quiz in a while. So, I went over to the site and took a battery of quizzes. What were the results? Apparently, I have a lesbian brain trapped in a man’s body. The equal length of my ring and index fingers indicate woman hands, and suggest that I had too little testosterone in the womb; which, in turn, means that I won’t be winning any footraces soon.

So, has this brought on any deep introspection? Well, for a moment I was reminded of an old Steve Martin number, the I’m me song, during which he stops and says “But wait. What if I’m a girl?” I just don’t happen to fit well on their scales. I’ve got very manly spatio-visual awareness, but also, apparently, a colossal corpus callosum, which may or may not, be more prevalent among the ladies.

At any rate, I’m not going to take much stock in it. My hairline suggests that whatever testosterone I may have missed in the womb was more than made up for later on.

Read the rest of this entry »

The fairest of them all

Friday, May 9th, 2008

Look at the images to the right and pick the one you find most attractive.

I know, they are all dashing. But many psychological studies have suggested that we find faces with more symmetry (as well as faces closer to the “average” face) to be more attractive. Also, it seems more attractive people get higher student ratings. And men with symmetrical faces produce more orgasms in their female partners. All to say: it’s good to be symmetrical.

The above images are a 5 minute hack job, and I suspect that the uncanny symmetry (particularly lighting effects) leads two of these images to be creepier than the third…

The bibliomancy meme redux

Sunday, February 10th, 2008

I’ve been tagged by Michael Zimmer with a bibliomancy meme. Regular readers know that I am a sucker for bibliomancy and “webomancy” of various forms. I was happy to participate in this theme’s grandfather over four years ago, and even created a script that did blogomancy.

So, the instructions are as follows: “grab the nearest book, open to page 123, go down to the 5th sentence and type up the 3 following sentences.” Simple enough, right?

Well, my office is a mess, and I have books strewn over my desk. Several of these are due for “discard,” as the libraries say, and other are related to my lectures for this week:

Try #1: Three Country Language Phrase Book: Japanese, English, Nepalese. Printed by the Toyama Prefecture; no date, but probably sometime in the 1980s. But it doesn’t have 123 pages.

Try #2: Defense Intelligence Agency, Warsaw Pact Ground Forces Equipment Identification Guide: Artillery, Rockets, and Missiles, February 1982. This is a great book to have around when watching Red Dawn , but since that happens very rarely, it’s not very useful. Page 123 contains a fuzzy photo of what appears to be a DDR soldier with an AT-3/Sagger armor-piercing missile. The caption reads “Ground mounted. Note the conical nose.” Which encourages a certain degree of ambiguity, since the soldier’s nose is indeed prominent and a bit round. But no 5th sentence.

Try #3: W. Cleon Skousen, The Communist Attack on US Police, Salt Lake City: Ensign Publishing Co., 1966. Too short by a single page.

Finally, by the fourth try, I actually managed to get my three sentences. This week, students from my course are reading from Michael Schudson’s Discovering the News. The quote:

Walter Lippman, in Public Opinion (1922), had begun to knock the “public” off the perch that the rhetoric of democracy had built for it. In The Phantom Public (1925), he was still more severe and critical of democratic ideals. “The private citizen today,” he wrote in the book’s opening sentence, “has come to feel rather like the deaf spectator in the back row, who ought to keep his mind on the mystery off there, but cannot quite manage to keep awake.”

I guess that’s cheating a little, since it sneaks in the first line of another book, but there it is.

And now I am supposed to tag others to do the same, but I do so half-heartedly; I will suffer no slight and you no misfortune if you do not carry this forward. Tagged: purse lip, square jaw, Kevin Lim, Adam Pacio, Kathleen Fitzpatrick, and Jason Nolan.

Update: I also retroactively tag Eszter Hargittai.

So High School

Wednesday, November 7th, 2007

Damn! I was aiming for the 7th grade-level.

cash advance

(via AKMA, whose blog I am able to comprehend only when sober and undistracted ;).)

Not X?

Thursday, August 23rd, 2007

This blog is rated… PG?

That doesn’t quite explain why I’m blocked by major filters. The rating changes depending on what is on the main page. I have a feeling that if it slurped up my archives, it would get a different rating, but even my cyberporn category only gets us down to an R. I’m not sure that a blog that fails to reach NC-17 is really playing to its full potential. (via Froomkin)

I’m really quite nice

Friday, April 14th, 2006

I’ve been avoiding the quizzy things lately, but thanks to Liz, I decided to find out just how much evilness lurks behind my pleasant exterior.




You Are 88% Evil



You’re the most evil person you know.

The devil is even a little scared of you!

How Evil Are You?

Come now, 88%? That’s just silly. They didn’t even ask about the biggies (Ever killed someone in duel? Bought a Mariah Carey album? Worked for a defense contractor? Eaten the last Crispy Cream? Clipped your nails in a public place?) Besides, “evil” is so early millennial. I prefer “principled neutral.”

Note, I don’t think that there is a manichean balance here. I suspect that I am also at least 99.44% good. I just have a good range. Think early Augustine with a dash of late Wittgenstein.

Online Survey Widgets

Wednesday, March 15th, 2006

PersonalDNA is Yet Another Myer-Briggs Test. But I’m not posting because of this, but rather because of the smooth design of the slider widgets for their survey. If you do online surveys, theirs is a good one to check out.

Anyone know if these are theirs or if they pulled them from a library? Wouldn’t be all that hard to reproduce them, in any case, but would make matters simpler if they were part of a (free) library.

Oh, and in case you are curious, here is what it thinks of me. I’m not sure how I can be radically open and also an authoritarian, but I am, after all, a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.


(Mouse over the below for a key to the colors. And no guarantee that I’ll keep it on here long, since it seems they are slow on serving the image.)