<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers as Villagers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alex.halavais.net/bloggers-as-villagers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alex.halavais.net/bloggers-as-villagers</link>
	<description>Things that interest me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:36:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marcia</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/bloggers-as-villagers/comment-page-1#comment-3386</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1203#comment-3386</guid>
		<description>Happy Belated Birthday!

I know this clash you speak of -- at times in my past I felt like I was one person at work and another at home, and another with my friends.  My biggest merge lately came a few years ago when I told my mother I bought a motorcycle.  Not that this is anything too outrageous, but she would have never suspected it, nor would, I suspect, any of my old high school friends.

I agree that there is value in uniting the various sides of our personalities.  However, I think there are definitely costs and I worry at times that there will be unknown negative repurcussions to what I do online.  Clancy has a good post on what could happen at work -- &quot;Bloggers need not apply&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Belated Birthday!</p>
<p>I know this clash you speak of &#8212; at times in my past I felt like I was one person at work and another at home, and another with my friends.  My biggest merge lately came a few years ago when I told my mother I bought a motorcycle.  Not that this is anything too outrageous, but she would have never suspected it, nor would, I suspect, any of my old high school friends.</p>
<p>I agree that there is value in uniting the various sides of our personalities.  However, I think there are definitely costs and I worry at times that there will be unknown negative repurcussions to what I do online.  Clancy has a good post on what could happen at work &#8212; &#8220;Bloggers need not apply&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imo</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/bloggers-as-villagers/comment-page-1#comment-3383</link>
		<dc:creator>Imo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1203#comment-3383</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re a HS sophomore, that makes me... like 6th grade. If you say so. Happy birthday, dude! Good luck on Junior year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re a HS sophomore, that makes me&#8230; like 6th grade. If you say so. Happy birthday, dude! Good luck on Junior year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Halavais</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/bloggers-as-villagers/comment-page-1#comment-3380</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Halavais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1203#comment-3380</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be honest: I&#039;m not real comfortable on the identity issues. I certainly don&#039;t think there is a true self, but I&#039;m also not sure there is a self at all. I tend to fall pretty heavily on the interactionist side, and think that self is constructed through interactions with others.

So, when you interact with lots of other people and they lack the intersubjective checks that allow them to decide who you are (e.g., my bowling crew doesn&#039;t consist of any of the people I generally dine with), you are going to have more fractured &quot;identities,&quot; but if your reference group is consistent, your identity will be as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be honest: I&#8217;m not real comfortable on the identity issues. I certainly don&#8217;t think there is a true self, but I&#8217;m also not sure there is a self at all. I tend to fall pretty heavily on the interactionist side, and think that self is constructed through interactions with others.</p>
<p>So, when you interact with lots of other people and they lack the intersubjective checks that allow them to decide who you are (e.g., my bowling crew doesn&#8217;t consist of any of the people I generally dine with), you are going to have more fractured &#8220;identities,&#8221; but if your reference group is consistent, your identity will be as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/bloggers-as-villagers/comment-page-1#comment-3379</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1203#comment-3379</guid>
		<description>In other words, there is no multiple selves. It seems like there is one true self that, like a crystal, looks differently under different light. Given this notion, perhaps having different environments (e.g. physical vs. virtual) are but merely providing different sets of resources for one to identify oneself. If a new environment were to be introduced, yet another version of the self would be seen. How, or better still, why see the true self? Can&#039;t we live with the sufficiently true identity of oneself (the legitimate proxy)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, there is no multiple selves. It seems like there is one true self that, like a crystal, looks differently under different light. Given this notion, perhaps having different environments (e.g. physical vs. virtual) are but merely providing different sets of resources for one to identify oneself. If a new environment were to be introduced, yet another version of the self would be seen. How, or better still, why see the true self? Can&#8217;t we live with the sufficiently true identity of oneself (the legitimate proxy)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->