<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An analysis of topical coverage of Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia</link>
	<description>Things that interest me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/comment-page-1#comment-200578</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/#comment-200578</guid>
		<description>David: that piece of it was mostly Derek, but I&#039;ll make sure he gets the request.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: that piece of it was mostly Derek, but I&#8217;ll make sure he gets the request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Palfrey</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/comment-page-1#comment-200577</link>
		<dc:creator>David Palfrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/#comment-200577</guid>
		<description>no interest at wikien-l, so I posted a link at the wikipedia talk pages for the wikiprojects for physics, linguistics &amp; poetry. would you be able to make your lists of the redlinks you found from the print encyclopedias you used to wikipedia? All in the interests of making your research outdated ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no interest at wikien-l, so I posted a link at the wikipedia talk pages for the wikiprojects for physics, linguistics &amp; poetry. would you be able to make your lists of the redlinks you found from the print encyclopedias you used to wikipedia? All in the interests of making your research outdated ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derek</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/comment-page-1#comment-200391</link>
		<dc:creator>derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/#comment-200391</guid>
		<description>Hm... the phrasing of the abstract did come out a bit... non-native.  Next time, in some sense, for example, we&#039;ll do better, as a result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm&#8230; the phrasing of the abstract did come out a bit&#8230; non-native.  Next time, in some sense, for example, we&#8217;ll do better, as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/comment-page-1#comment-200390</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/#comment-200390</guid>
		<description>@David, thanks!

@Peter: It&#039;s not you--the labelling is unfortunately confusing. We probably should have combined them for the purposes of the graph. E is generally US history &amp; Americana, F is history of the Americas. They are often listed together as E-F, but when we coded the articles, it was actually to the next level of specificity. (E.g, to two letters, not just one).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David, thanks!</p>
<p>@Peter: It&#8217;s not you&#8211;the labelling is unfortunately confusing. We probably should have combined them for the purposes of the graph. E is generally US history &#038; Americana, F is history of the Americas. They are often listed together as E-F, but when we coded the articles, it was actually to the next level of specificity. (E.g, to two letters, not just one).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Jacobi</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/comment-page-1#comment-200389</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Jacobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/#comment-200389</guid>
		<description>Is it only me, or is there an error in the categories? Both &quot;E&quot; and &quot;F&quot; are labelled &quot;Amer. History&quot; in the graphs (and one of them is an under- the other an overrepresented category).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it only me, or is there an error in the categories? Both &#8220;E&#8221; and &#8220;F&#8221; are labelled &#8220;Amer. History&#8221; in the graphs (and one of them is an under- the other an overrepresented category).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/comment-page-1#comment-200388</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/#comment-200388</guid>
		<description>I posted a link to wikien-l, with a suggestion people use this to fill out the red link lists - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Red_list</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a link to wikien-l, with a suggestion people use this to fill out the red link lists &#8211; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Red_list" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Red_list</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/comment-page-1#comment-200387</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.halavais.net/an-analysis-of-topical-coverage-of-wikipedia/#comment-200387</guid>
		<description>english speakers?   not if you ever visit illinois.   here it is mandated that the language is called American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>english speakers?   not if you ever visit illinois.   here it is mandated that the language is called American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

