<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abstract of a Non-Existent Paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alex.halavais.net/abstract-of-a-non-existent-paper/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alex.halavais.net/abstract-of-a-non-existent-paper</link>
	<description>Things that interest me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex H.</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/abstract-of-a-non-existent-paper/comment-page-1#comment-226500</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.halavais.net/?p=2555#comment-226500</guid>
		<description>Alex: I&#039;m not sure if D&amp;G&#039;s conception ties in. I need to circle back and read on that. So far, I&#039;ve been trying to collect examples and looking for--well, perhaps not a genealogy. I&#039;m not sure there really are connections beyond my own taxonomy. In some ways this may be a McLuhanist project. I may have to re-read and adjust some of my anti-McLuhan bias if that turns out to be the case.

And although this was to be a &quot;short paper&quot; in fact it is a non-existent &quot;short book&quot; that has been on the back burner forever. I now need to decide if this is my next book, or the one after that. Or if I&#039;m crazy enough to try to write two at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex: I&#8217;m not sure if D&amp;G&#8217;s conception ties in. I need to circle back and read on that. So far, I&#8217;ve been trying to collect examples and looking for&#8211;well, perhaps not a genealogy. I&#8217;m not sure there really are connections beyond my own taxonomy. In some ways this may be a McLuhanist project. I may have to re-read and adjust some of my anti-McLuhan bias if that turns out to be the case.</p>
<p>And although this was to be a &#8220;short paper&#8221; in fact it is a non-existent &#8220;short book&#8221; that has been on the back burner forever. I now need to decide if this is my next book, or the one after that. Or if I&#8217;m crazy enough to try to write two at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atemporality: a Viable Historical Orientation?</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/abstract-of-a-non-existent-paper/comment-page-1#comment-226338</link>
		<dc:creator>Atemporality: a Viable Historical Orientation?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.halavais.net/?p=2555#comment-226338</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] He’s responding to Bruce Sterling’s talk, “Atemporality and the Creative Artist” as well as Alex Halavais’s post on “worn technologies.” I re-post it here because it helps me think through some of the ways that book-futurists [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Reid</title>
		<link>http://alex.halavais.net/abstract-of-a-non-existent-paper/comment-page-1#comment-226270</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.halavais.net/?p=2555#comment-226270</guid>
		<description>This makes sense to me Alex. I&#039;m not quite sure if this is what you are after here, but I thought you might find this blog on posthumanocentric archaeology interesting: http://haecceities.wordpress.com/. Also, just more generally the kind of phylogenetic technological lineages that Deleuze and Guattari take up in A Thousand Plateaus. That&#039;s how I&#039;m reading this, I guess. Are you thinking along those lines or somethign else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes sense to me Alex. I&#8217;m not quite sure if this is what you are after here, but I thought you might find this blog on posthumanocentric archaeology interesting: <a href="http://haecceities.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://haecceities.wordpress.com/</a>. Also, just more generally the kind of phylogenetic technological lineages that Deleuze and Guattari take up in A Thousand Plateaus. That&#8217;s how I&#8217;m reading this, I guess. Are you thinking along those lines or somethign else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

